LETTERS TO THE PRESS - 2006

 Click to select.            Back to:   Home page.    Main menu.

December 2006 - A fairer society from a new government?
August 2006  - Mr. Gelling and inflation.
July 2006 _ Mr. Gelling.  Fuel cost and inflation.
June 2006 - Pensions and prices.
May 2006 - Freedom to Flourish / perish.
April 2006 - MHKs' pay rise and other incomes..
March 2006 - Allan Bell.  Spin doctoring and Working Lunch programme.
February 2006 - Younger ideas in Tynwald.
January 2006 - Fuel costs overtaking pensions.



December 2006 - A fairer society from a new government?

May I echo the sentiments of Peter Chapman and William Quigley (Examiner 12th and 19th December).  The general election seems to leave very little changed, thus condemning the Island to "more as before."
 
Shall we continue to have an out-dated economy based on motorbikes and tax fiddles, now supported by the moral decadence of on-line gambling?  Or could we possibly seek new directions in a developing world, where "green" issues must predominate to ensure its survival?
 
With cheap wind and tidal power, and the right ledership, could we be at the cutting edge of the new technology needed for this?  Building on our newly found "freedom to flourish", could we develop into an "Island of enterprise", bringing prosperity to all, rather than fermenting a culture of greed for the few?  What was it the government once said about "all sharing in a prosperous and caring society"?
 
During my time in the Island, the tax burden has shifted greatly from the rich to the poor.  For the wealthy, income tax has been cut to 18% and capped at £100,000.  For the rest of us, domestic rates and water charges have risen at many times the rate of inflation, making bigger and bigger holes in pensions and low wages.
 
Fuel costs alone now rise faster than pensions, and may consume them completely before the next election.  Yet nowhere in any manifesto did I find  priority given to this.  One of our re-elected MHKs, when questioned about non payment of the winter fuel allowance, told more than one constituent he would be happy give the heating allowance, but take away the Christmas bonus in return.  Just how "Scroogelike" can one get?
 
We are told that : "Our economy is strong. Income and reserves are at an all time high, and unemployment low".  In that case, why are pensioners shivering in their homes for fear of the heating cost?  Is it not time to put Christ back into Christmas and share out these resources more fairly?  Give us all a decent pension that keeps up with the cost of living.  We have all earned it.  We have all paid for it.  We all deserve it.  It should not be cut in real value year after year, by the rising cost of fuel.  Could it be time to abolish the present discriminatory payment of the Manx pension supplement?
 
No.  I expect that Scrooge will reign for another five years.  Our new and re-elected MHKs will have their own priorities.  Is anyone placing odds on how long it will be before they vote themselves another whacking great pay rise?  I'll wager it will be long before they do anything about our pensions.

Back to top



August 2006 -  Mr, Gelling and inflation.

How I hate to say "I told you so", but a small group of us have been warning for years about impending fuel poverty for pensioners.  With more than two full pages about it in last week's Independent (4th August), and an approacing general election, can our government still continue to ignore it?
 
Does anyone really believe Donald Gelling's recent pronouncement that "pensions are ahead of inflation"?  To preserve any kind of public credibility, the government must act now, rather than wait for election defeats. 
 
Here are some options:-
 
(1)  Introduce a variable "Fuel Cost Supplement" to all pensions.
 
(2)  Revise methods of calculating inflation to represent a true value for low income households.
 
(3)  Accept that it is not just those on income support who need help.
 
(4)  End discrimination in payment of the "Manx Pension Supplement".
 
(5)  Replace council rates by an income related tax.
 
To those who say that we can't afford it, let me say that without plenty of money in the kitty, Richard Corkill could not have afforded to cut the top rate of income tax to eighteen percent, nor Allan Bell to introduce the tax capping for millionaires.
 
<>Whatever happened to "Sharing in a Prosperous and Caring Society"?

Back to top



July 2006 _ Mr. Gelling.  Fuel cost and inflation.

I refer to the Courier's front page headline (July 13): "Gelling insists pensions are keeping ahead of inflation".
 
Oh dear!  With all due respect to Mr. Gelling, I do believe he must have mistakenly picked up the government's inflation figures instead of the real ones.
 
Now, I have noted that the annual amount of the state pension for 1997 was £3,247, and for 2006 is £4,381 - an increase of £1,134.  Over the same period, the annual cost of our domestic fuel and rates rose from £1,522 to £2,464 - an increase of £942.  So, of the £1,134 pension increase, £942, or 83% of it, is taken to cover fuel and rates alone, leaving only £189, or 17%, to cover everything else.  Is this keeping up with inflation?
 
More figures emerge.  In 1997, 47% of the pension was spent on fuel and rates, while for 2006 the figure is 56%.  An ever increasing proportion.  The percentage increase in pensions over the period is 35% while for fuel and rates it is 62%.  Reduced to an average annual percentage increase, we have pensions at 3.4%, and fuel and rates at 5.5%.
 
Following the recent steep increases in fuel prices, later calculations over a shorter period are likely to show pension increases being more than swamped by fuel cost rises alone.  I ask again: Is this keeping up with inflation?
 
Really Mr. Gelling, could I ask you to please step down off your cloud and talk to pensioners in the real world, who experience at first hand the diminishing value of their pensions.  I will be pleased to discuss my calculations with you further, in the hope of convincing you of the need for positive action in restoring the value of pensions.
 
(In addition to the address below, I can be contacted at www.justiceforpensioners.com)

Back to top



June 2006
- Pensions and prices.

I write in response to your article: "Pensions fail to keep up with prices" - (Examiner June 6 2006).  It is at last comforting to know that one MHK (Bill Henderson) now recognises this fact.  It has of course been known for many years by many of your readers, including myself, who have contributed to these columns.
 
It is not my intention to bore anyone by lengthy restatement of what I have said before.  Let me simply say that today's pensioners are victims of false government inflation figures on which pension rises are based, and which do not reflect expenditure by low income households, who spend a larger proportion on fuel and rates that increase rapidly, and less on new gadgets like DVD players and digital cameras, that fall rapidly in price after their introduction.  Pensioners, not having the benefit of a heated workplace, also have to spend more on home heating.
 
During the last sixty years, the prices of many essential items have increased by a hundredfold, which corresponds to an average annual inflation of eight percent.  A pre-war pound is now worth only one new penny.  For houses, the annual inflation figure is closer to eleven percent. The government figures of around two or three percent are beyond any rational belief.  They just give an excuse for holding down pensions.
 
The relentless increase in the cost of fuel, water and domestic rates, at many times that of pensions, will result in these items alone soon consuming the whole of one's pension, leaving nothing to spend on anything else.  This is a mathematical fact if nothing is done to intervene.  In the face of the poverty that must result from this, our MHKs in general seem to just bury their heads in the sand.  Where is the "freedom to flourish" when Half the population could be on income support?  Who would want to invest in an island with a benefit culture?
 
To bring an element of common sense and justice into our government, could I suggest a "second chamber" chosen at random like a jury from across the population, and spanning all age and income groups.  Our present MHKs seem so protected by their high salaries and assured pensions, that they have no conception of how the rest of us have to struggle.



May 2006 =- Freedom to Flourish / perish.


"Freedom to Flourish".  For whom I wonder - perhaps our new tax-capped millionaires?  Certainly not our pensioners, who face record fuel price rises and uncapped rates bills.  For them it is more likely to be: "Freedom to Perish".




April 2006 - MHKs' pay rise and other incomes.


Why all the fuss about MHK's pay?  A quick calculation shows their increase to be very close to 8%,  just about in line with inflation.  Real inflation that is, not the figure of two-point-something regularly trotted out by by both the UK and Manx governments, to hold down wages, pensions and benefits.
 
It is a pity  that the generosity of our MHK's  does not extend to the rest of us, with an 8% rise in all incomes, not just their own.   After the swingeing increases in fuel costs, that  threaten to completely consume the state pension in a short time, can any sane person really believe that inflation is running at between 2 and 3%?
 
I have just done some more quick calculations.  My household's fuel bills during the last six months total £1,461.  That is for gas electricity and solid fuel.  Over the same length of time, this represents 69% of the state pension, 47% of the state pension with Manx supplement, and 27% of the minimum wage for a 40 hour week.
 
Do we, or do we not, have a fuel cost crisis?

Back to top



March 2006 - Allan Bell,  Spin doctoring and Working Lunch programme.

Did anyone see the recent BBC2 "Working Lunch" programme about the Isle of Man, or read the corresponding webpage?
 
This latter document seems to be a record piece of spin doctoring by Allan Bell, who describes the Island as an economic miracle.  Where is the economic miracle, where thousands of pensioners live in fear of the next inflation busting bill for electricity, gas, water or rates?  With pensions tied to a fictitious inflation figure between 2 and 3 percent, fuel prices rising at 17%, water at 12%, and council rates at 7%, we see a bleak future of extreme poverty for many.  Is our economy out of control?
 
"A welfare state funded at the same rate as the UK"?  Yes, and in the same state of crisis, with the same lack of dentists.  Mr. Bell says: "OUR pensioners get 50% more than in Britain.  This leaves many of us who are not HIS pensioners, and do not even receive the heating allowance they would in Britain.
 
There is much trumpeting about online gaming.  Is this something to be proud of?  Gambling can be as destructive and addictive as drink or drugs.  The mention of millionaires' yachts simply rubs home the the expanding gap between rich and poor, now made worse by the new millionaire tax capping.  It is the poor who will pay for it.
 
An economic miracle?  Well no, some of us think we are in a bit of a mess, and look forward to the next general election.
 
Come on Mr. Bell, pay us all a decent pension, with a regularly updated fuel allowance, and we might not shout so loud.
Back to top



March 2006 - Robbing poor to pay rich
 
For the wealthy, all income over £100,000 is now to be tax free *.  This really is rubbing salt into the wounds of pensioners, now facing their biggest ever hike in the cost of keeping warm.
 
Not even the "Iron Lady" herself could get such extreme right-wing legislation through parliament.  Robbing the poor to pay the rich is an understatement.  The tax shortfall will have to be met from somewhere, and my guess is that pensions will be the first target by their continued failure to keep up with the true cost of living.
 
Since the latest fuel price rises, more people must realise, that government inflation figures are far from the truth.   While such items as food and clothing have stayed within reasonable bounds, the unavoidable costs of fuel, water and council rates have galloped away at many times the so called inflation rate.  There will be no justice until we have restored the link between pensions and earnings, and found a fair alternative to the rates.  We are still denied the winter fuel allowance as paid in the UK.  Why?
 
For those who can remember the cost of things years ago, I have produced an inflation calculator chart that can be downloaded and printed at:- www.justiceforpensioners.com/infgraph.html
I invite pensioners to test their memories on what prices used to be, and (perhaps with the aid of their grandchildren to download it), use the chart to get the true inflation rates.
 
For example.  60 years ago, electricity was a ha'penny a unit, and now approaching 12p, or nearly half-a-crown in old money.  An increase of nearly 60 times, or from the chart, an average annual inflation rate of 7%.
 
Try it with houses.  Divide the price at which you sold a house by the price at which you bought it.  Refer to the chart with the years between, and you have the inflation rate.  Try it with any prices you remember.
 
I shall be pleased to receive  any feedback, either at the address below, or via the Justice for Pensioners website.

(* This was an error due to misunderstanding.  The £100,000 in fact refers to the maximum tax paid in a year.  Apologies for this).




February 2006 - Younger ideas in Tynwald.

On reading about votes for 16 year olds, my first reaction was that it was a cunning plot by the government to dilute the pensioner vote, which they must now fear.  Then I thought again.  Why not go further, and allow 16 year olds to stand as members of the House of Keys?
 
At this tender age, there could be less chance of their social and moral values having been contaminated by the corruption and greed  of business and politics.  A chance perhaps to save the environment, close the gap between rich and poor, ensure winter warmth for pensioners and health care without waiting lists.  Just a matter of sharing what we have instead of fighting over it.  The common good taking precedence over the bottom line of profit.
 
With the benefit of younger ideas and forward vision, we might now be enjoying some of the following:-  Cheap electricity from winds and tides, without dependence on world markets.  A full digital broadcasting service from the BBC.  Free discussion of local topics on local radio - as enjoyed by most of Britain.  Equal treatment of pensioners, and no withholding of the winter fuel payment.  A fair income-based local government tax replacing the archaic rating system that eats up pensions.  And with our road deaths at my last count over 3 times (proportionally) that of the UK, some agreement on a speed limit.
 
There are few social problems that would not be solved by more equal distribution of wealth.  A few years back, our government cut the top rate of income tax by 2%.  We are now seeing the result in health service cuts, and massive increases in rates bills.  For a government to suggest a cap on income tax when it is short of money is utterly ludicrous.  Just who will make up the shortfall?
 
Some wild ideas perhaps, but possibly scope for discussion.  What do you think?

Back to top



January 2006 - Fuel costs overtaking pensions.

Four years ago, when the IOM Pensioners Association was formed, the main controversial issues were the denial, to pensioners from the UK, of the winter heating allowance and the highly discriminatory Manx pension supplement.  No one needs reminding how things have changed, and pensions have now become everyone's concern.
 
That in itself is one major crisis.  Fuel prices have become another.  Put the two together and we have an unprecedented super crisis, of which our government still seems oblivious.
 
The accompanying chart shows at a glance how fuel costs alone are now rapidly eating up pensions.  Taking the government's own figures of 17.6% inflation for heating and lighting costs, and 2.7% for the next pension increase, the chart shows how these values will grow if both rates are sustained.  Some thought was given to choosing the typical low income values of £5,000 annual pension and £1,000 annual fuel costs.  However, whatever values are chosen, the principle is the same, of a steeply rising cost curve overtaking a slowly rising income curve.  In this, case the pension is completely extinguished by the rising fuel cost after 12 years.
 
The position is really worse than it looks.  The reducing amount of remaining pension is further reduced in spending power by inflation, not just at 2.7 % but something more real.  Those who remember electricity at a ha'penny a unit, a hundredweight of coal or a gallon of petrol for little more than a shilling, and fares at a penny a mile, will know what I mean.  Some of us remember our arithmetic too, and are not totally confused by going decimal and metric.  Long term inflation since World War Two has been at about 8% for most things, and 11% for houses.  This makes nonsense of the usual government figure of "two point something".
 
It is even worse still when we add the effects of the steeply rising costs of water and domestic rates.  The proposed property revaluation will in reality be the hated council tax that has brought poverty and despair to pensioners in the UK.  Unless a change of course is adopted, severe poverty will be the fate of many who may now think of themselves as "getting by comfortably".
 
Do we want to become an island of poverty, and means tested benefits?  Will that attract those who want to invest here?  Some say: "Make poverty history".  To that I add: "Poverty begins at home".  Let us put our own house in order.  In a fair economy, there should be no need for means testing.  The basic state pension should keep up with real inflation, and rates should be abolished and replaced by an income related tax.
 
Who cares about this impending poverty? Any of our public figures?  The Chief Minister, The Lieutenant Governor, or the Bishop?  Can our MHK's perform the arithmetic to know what is happening?  And what about all those fresh new candidates for the House of Keys, now waiting in the wings during this election year?  When shall we hear from them?
 
Please - somebody - do something.  Don't let this island drown in a sea of apathy.